HackerTube 中文?

Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman

MetosinYouTube ↗

Further reading 1

Does splitting code actually split its dependencies? →Start with a rule that sends an email. Separate deciding from doing, then inspect layers, objects and abstractions: which parts must still change together when the rule changes?This video helps answer · Can you isolate side effects in the language you already use?

Caption notes

Platform access, timing, popular applications and network effects help explain language adoption. Functional techniques can spread even when functional languages do not.

Original passages · 6
they had a killer app another is they had some form of platform exclusivity
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 1:55–2:08
I don't want to learn that because if I invest in it
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 18:03–18:17
no language features are required to program this style like you can almost
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 36:07–36:18
classifying languages as functional or not is kind of arbitrary definitely very fuzzy
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 43:21–43:38
of platform exclusivity another is they
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 2:01–2:06
mutation and side effects I'm claiming
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman · ▶ 35:54–35:58

Hacker News comments

View original on HN ↗