HackerTube 中文?

USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

USENIXYouTube ↗

Further reading 1

Does running a model explain its decision? →Executing a model yields an answer. Explaining why that answer followed, or predicting its behavior under a new input, requires further evidence.

Caption notes

Mickens questions deploying opaque, hard-to-test models in high-stakes settings and argues that a security analysis must include social consequences.

Original passages · 6
you connect that inscrutable thing to important real life things like financial markets
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 16:27–16:37
how should that action be implemented to achieve societally beneficial outcomes
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 30:17–30:27
check your algorithms for biased input data to look for skews
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 50:06–50:13
deny by default firewall to prevent outsiders from probing those sensitive devices
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 45:24–45:33
systems do the right thing even in the presence of malicious inputs
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 5:27–5:34
technology is value neutral and will therefore automatically lead to good outcomes
USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible? · ▶ 37:02–37:10

Hacker News comments

View original on HN ↗